Publications

2024

• Aparecida Rosa De Queiroz D., Pannunzio Ribeiro M., André Tavares P. & De Mello K. 2024. The role of forest plantations for the native vegetation conservation in the protected areas surroundings. Journal for Nature Conservation.78: 126551.
• Boncourt E., Bergès L., Alp M., Dupont B., Herviault T. & Evette A. 2024. Riparian habitat connectivity restoration in an anthropized landscape: A multi-species approach based on landscape graph and soil bioengineering structures. Environmental Management.
• Cidre-González A., Rivas C.A. & Navarro-Cerrillo R.M. 2024. Fragmentation and Connectivity in dehesa Ecosystems Associated with Cerambyx spp. Dispersion and Control: A Graph-Theory Approach. Forests.15: 648.
• D’Ercole J., Bertoncini S., Giannì M., Taglioli L., Brisighelli F., Campera M., Ramanamanjato J., Tsagnangara C., Capelli C., Donati G. & Tofanelli S. 2024. Long‐term genetic monitoring of a translocated population of collared brown lemurs. J Wildl Manag.88: e22500.
• Li W., Liu P., Yang N., Chen S., Guo X., Wang B. & Zhang L. 2024. Improving landscape connectivity through habitat restoration: application for Asian elephant conservation in Xishuangbanna Prefecture, China. Integr. Zool..19: 319–335.
• McCluskey E.M., Kuzma F.C., Enander H.D., Cole‐Wick A., Coury M., Cuthrell D.L., Johnson C., Kelso M., Lee Y.M., Methner D., Rowe L., Swinehart A. & Moore J.A. 2024. Assessing habitat connectivity of rare species to inform urban conservation planning. Ecology and Evolution.14: e11105.
• Morin E., Razafimbelo N.T., Yengué J.-L., Guinard Y., Grandjean F. & Bech N. 2024. Are human-induced changes good or bad to dynamic landscape connectivity?. Journal of Environmental Management.352: 120009.
• Regnier C., Tu G., Legras S., Hilal M. & Détang-Dessendre C. 2024. Are households’ residential preferences consistent with biodiversity conservation in different urban contexts? Housing Studies.39: 720–745.
• Rivas C.A., Guerrero-Casado J. & Navarro-Cerrillo R.M. 2024a. Functional connectivity across dominant forest ecosystems in Ecuador: A major challenge for a country with a high deforestation rate. Journal for Nature Conservation.78: 126549.
• Rivas C.A., Guerrero‐Casado J. & Navarro‐Cerrillo R.M. 2024b. Assessment of habitat connectivity in a highly fragmented ecosystem: The seasonal tropical dry forest in Ecuador. Applied Vegetation Science.27: e12770.
• Savary P., Tannier C., Foltête J.-C., Bourgeois M., Vuidel G., Khimoun A., Moal H. & Garnier S. 2024. How does dispersal shape the genetic patterns of animal populations in European cities? A simulation approach. Peer Community Journal.4: e40.
• Stuart C., Wedding L., Pittman S., Serafy J., Moura A., Bruckner A. & Green S. 2024. Seascape connectivity modeling predicts hotspots of fish-derived nutrient provisioning to restored coral reefs. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser..731: 179–196.
• Von Thaden J.J., Lithgow D., Revollo-Fernández D.A., Salazar-Vargas M.D.P. & Rodríguez De Los Santos A. 2024. The Effects of Implementing Three Climate-Smart Practices with an Integrated Landscape Approach on Functional Connectivity and Carbon Storage. Land.13: 389.

2023

• Daniel A., Savary P., Foltête J., Khimoun A., Faivre B., Ollivier A., Éraud C., Moal H., Vuidel G. & Garnier S. 2023. Validating graph‐based connectivity models with independent presence–absence and genetic data sets. Conservation Biology.37: e14047.
• Danneck J., Chin Fung Tiang D., Ngo Duc K., Azhar B., Sanusi R., Campos‐Arceiz A. & Lechner A.M. 2023. Conserving urban tropical biodiversity by connecting networks of green patches. Integrative Conservation.2: 80–94.
• Jaramillo J.J., Rivas C.A., Oteros J. & Navarro-Cerrillo R.M. 2023. Forest Fragmentation and Landscape Connectivity Changes in Ecuadorian Mangroves: Some Hope for the Future?. Applied Sciences.13: 5001.
• Kosma M., Laita A. & Duflot R. 2023. No net loss of connectivity: Conserving habitat networks in the context of urban expansion. Landscape and Urban Planning.239: 104847.
• Lumia G., Praticò S., Di Fazio S., Cushman S. & Modica G. 2023. Combined use of urban Atlas and Corine land cover datasets for the implementation of an ecological network using graph theory within a multi-species approach. Ecological Indicators.148: 110150.
• Navarro-Cerrillo R.M., Rivas C.A., Quinto L., Navarro S.H., Varo-Martínez ´María Ángeles & Palacios-Rodríguez P. 2023. Afforestation on agricultural land in southern Spain: an important driver to improve forest landscape connectivity. New Forests.54: 1061–1084.
• Ortega U., Ametzaga-Arregi I., Sertutxa U. & Peña L. 2023. Identifying a green infrastructure to prioritise areas for restoration to enhance the landscape connectivity and the provision of ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol.38: 3751–3765.
• Portillo-Reyes H.O., Mejía D., Elvir F. & Flores M.E. 2023. Evaluación de la conectividad y viabilidad del corredor biológico para el puma (Puma concolor) en las áreas protegidas de la región del occidente de Honduras. RMM.13: .
• Quimis Gómez A.J., Rivas C.A., González-Moreno P. & Navarro-Cerrillo R.M. 2023. Forest Plantations in Manabí (Ecuador): Assessment of Fragmentation and Connectivity to Support Dry Tropical Forests Conservation. Applied Sciences.13: 6418.
• Rahimi E., Barghjelveh S. & Dong P. 2023. Estimating the pollination supply of urban green spaces to determine suitable areas for urban agriculture in the city of Tehran. Urban Ecosyst.26: 19–30.
• Rahman H., Hidayat R.A., Nofrizal A.Y., Wilastra I. & Nasution A.F.R. 2023. Priority Corridor Zone for Human-Tiger Conflict Mitigation: A Landscape Connectivity Approach in West Sumatra Region, Indonesia. Journal for Nature Conservation.76: 126501.
• Tang T., Li J., Sun H. & Velázquez J. 2023a. Integrated approach considering seasonal variability and habitat uncertainty to map habitat for the prey of South China tiger. Ecological Indicators.148: 110082.
• Tang T., Li J. & Velázquez J. 2023b. Determination of forest priority levels for wild boar by analysis of habitat suitability and landscape connectivity. Front. Ecol. Evol..11: 1085272.
• Tiang Chin Fung D., Van Der Ree R., McCaffrey N., Gibbins C. & Lechner A.M. 2023. Ecological connectivity in environmental impact assessments: modelling alternative highway bypass scenarios. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.41: 349–373.
• Zhan F., Liu Z. & Wang B. 2023. Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of the “Contraction–Expansion” Change of the Boundary Area between Two Green Belts in Beijing Based on a Multi-Index System. Land.12: 1621.

2022

• Bourgeois M., Sahraoui Y. & Dietrich J. 2022. The contributions of socio-environmental information maps in an environmental mobilisation: the case of a fight against a highway project in France. Local Environment.27: 1102–1121.
• Clevenot L., Clauzel C., Tourret K., Carre C. & Pech P. 2022. How much can highway stormwater ponds contribute to amphibian ecological network connectivity?. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal.40: 517–530.
• Froidevaux J.S.P., Laforge A., Larrieu L., Barbaro L., Park K., Fialas P.C. & Jones G. 2022. Tree size, microhabitat diversity and landscape structure determine the value of isolated trees for bats in farmland. Biological Conservation.267: 109476.
• Kim J. & Kang W. 2022. Assessing Green Roof Contributions to Tree Canopy Ecosystem Services and Connectivity in a Highly Urbanized Area. Land.11: 1281.
• Lalechère E. & Bergès L. 2022. Importance of climate‐induced tree species composition changes in forecasting the amount of reachable habitat for forest birds. Diversity and Distributions.28: 1781–1794.
• Lalechere E., Berges L., Vacher J., Monnet J.-M. & Fuhr M. 2022. Building a Network of Overmature Forests Using Airborne Laser Scanning and Landscape Graphs. IGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 5901–5904.
• Leblond M., Rudolph T., Boisjoly D., Dussault C. & St‐Laurent M. 2022. Science‐informed policy decisions lead to the creation of a protected area for a wide‐ranging species at risk. Conservat Sci and Prac.4: e12833.
• Li H., Chen H., Wu M., Zhou K., Zhang X. & Liu Z. 2022a. A Dynamic Evaluation Method of Urban Ecological Networks Combining Graphab and the FLUS Model. Land.11: 2297.
• Li Y., Zhang Y., Xue Y., Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Gao Y. & Li D. 2022b. Analysis of Conservation Gaps and Landscape Connectivity for Snow Leopard in Qilian Mountains of China. Sustainability.14: 1638.
• Liang X., Jin X., He J., Wang X., Xu C., Qiao G., Zhang X. & Zhou Y. 2022. Impacts of land management practice strategy on regional ecosystems: Enlightenment from ecological redline adjustment in Jiangsu, China. Land Use Policy.119: 106137.
• Liccari F., Boscutti F., Bacaro G. & Sigura M. 2022. Connectivity, landscape structure, and plant diversity across agricultural landscapes: novel insight into effective ecological network planning. Journal of Environmental Management.317: 115358.
• Louis-lucas T., Clauzel C., Mayrand F., Clergeau P. & Machon N. 2022. Role of green roofs in urban connectivity, an exploratory approach using landscape graphs in the city of Paris, France. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.78: 127765.
• Lozada A. & Bertin A. 2022. Spatial autocorrelation signatures of ecological determinants on plant community characteristics in high Andean wetlands. Sci Rep.12: 13770.
• Mony C., Landais Q., Georges R., Butet A., Burel F., Jambon O., Gouesbet V. & Ernoult A. 2022. Effects of connectivity on seed dispersal patterns in hedgerows. J Vegetation Science.33: e13113.
• Morin E., Herrault P.-A., Guinard Y., Grandjean F. & Bech N. 2022. The promising combination of a remote sensing approach and landscape connectivity modelling at a fine scale in urban planning. Ecological Indicators.139: 108930.
• Niyogi R., Shekhar Sarkar M., Shekhar Niyogi V., Hazra P. & John R. 2022. Habitat connectivity for conserving cervids in a multifunctional landscape. Journal for Nature Conservation.68: 126212.
• Pannunzio Ribeiro M., De Mello K., Averna Valente R. 2022. How can forest fragments support protected areas connectivity in an urban landscape in Brazil? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.74: 1276.
• Préau C., Tournebize J., Lenormand M., Alleaume S., Boussada V.G. & Luque S. 2022. Habitat connectivity in agricultural landscapes improving multi-functionality of constructed wetlands as nature-based solutions. Ecological Engineering.182: 106725.
• Rivas C.A., Guerrero-Casado J. & Navarro-Cerrillo R.M. 2022. A New Combined Index to Assess the Fragmentation Status of a Forest Patch Based on Its Size, Shape Complexity, and Isolation. Diversity.14: 896.
• Savary P., Foltête J.-C., Van Strien M.J., Moal H., Vuidel G. & Garnier S. 2022. Assessing the influence of the amount of reachable habitat on genetic structure using landscape and genetic graphs. Heredity.128: 120–131.
• Serret H., Andersen D., Deguines N., Clauzel C., Park W.-H. & Jang Y. 2022. Towards Ecological Management and Sustainable Urban Planning in Seoul, South Korea: Mapping Wild Pollinator Habitat Preferences and Corridors Using Citizen Science Data. Animals.12: 1469.
• Thuillier L., Zutter C.D., Leca D. & Machon N. 2022. STOREVAL, un indicateur de valeur écologique du foncier pour la définition de meilleures stratégies de gestion des sites des entreprises en lien avec les réseaux écologiques locaux. vertigo.
• Uroy L., Mony C., Ernoult A. & Alignier A. 2022. Increasing habitat connectivity in agricultural landscapes as a weed management strategy reconciling ecology and agronomy. Basic and Applied Ecology.61: 116–130.
• Von Thaden J., Salazar-Arteaga H., Laborde J., Estrada-Contreras I. & Romero-Uribe H. 2022. Arboreal elements of the agricultural matrix as structural connecting devices in fragmented landscapes – A case study in the Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve. Ecological Engineering.179: 106633.
• Wang M., Park S.-Y., Dietrich C. & Kleinmann J. 2022. Selection of scenarios for landscape-level risk assessment of chemicals: case studies for mammals. Environ Sci Eur.34: 35.
• Wu J., Zhang S., Wen H. & Fan X. 2022. Research on Multi-Scale Ecological Network Connectivity—Taking the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area as a Case Study. IJERPH.19: 15268.
• Zárrate Charry D.A., González-Maya J.F., Arias-Alzate A., Jiménez-Alvarado J.S., Reyes Arias J.D., Armenteras D. & Betts M.G. 2022. Connectivity conservation at the crossroads: protected areas versus payments for ecosystem services in conserving connectivity for Colombian carnivores. R. Soc. open sci..9: 201154.
• Zhang R., Zhang Q., Zhang L., Zhong Q., Liu J. & Wang Z. 2022. Identification and extraction of a current urban ecological network in Minhang District of Shanghai based on an optimization method. Ecological Indicators.136: 108647.

2021

• Foltête J.-C., Vuidel G., Savary P., Clauzel C., Sahraoui Y., Girardet X. & Bourgeois M. 2021. Graphab: an application for modeling and managing ecological habitat networks. Software Impacts.8: 100065.
• Gilfedder L, Appleby M.W, Lechner A.M, Sprod D, Carter O, Burgess S, Davidson N.J & Harris R. 2021. Tasmanian Midlands: A case study of increasing sophistication in conservation planning and action over four decades. Ecological Management & Restoration.22: 11–23.
• Godet C. & Clauzel C. 2021. Comparison of landscape graph modelling methods for analysing pond network connectivity. Landscape Ecol.36: 735–748.
• Han Q. & Keeffe G. 2021. Promoting climate-driven forest migration through large-scale urban afforestation. Landscape and Urban Planning.212: 104124.
• Mu B., Tian G., Xin G., Hu M., Yang P., Wang Y., Xie H., Mayer A.L. & Zhang Y. 2021. Measuring Dynamic Changes in the Spatial Pattern and Connectivity of Surface Waters Based on Landscape and Graph Metrics: A Case Study of Henan Province in Central China. Land.10: 471.
• Niyogi R., Sarkar M.S., Hazra P., Rahman M., Banerjee S. & John R. 2021. Habitat Connectivity for the Conservation of Small Ungulates in A Human-Dominated Landscape. IJGI.10: 180.
• Sahraoui Y., Clauzel C. & Foltête J.-C. 2021. A metrics-based approach for modeling covariation of visual and ecological landscape qualities. Ecological Indicators.123: 107331.
• Sahraoui Y., De Godoy Leski C., Benot M.-L., Revers F., Salles D., van Halder I., Barneix M. & Carassou L. 2021. Integrating ecological networks modelling in a participatory approach for assessing impacts of planning scenarios on landscape connectivity. Landscape and Urban Planning.209: 104039.
• Savary P., Foltête J., Moal H., Vuidel G. & Garnier S. 2021. Analysing landscape effects on dispersal networks and gene flow with genetic graphs. Mol Ecol Resour.21: 1167–1185.
• Savary P., Foltête J., Moal H., Vuidel G. & Garnier S. 2021. graph4lg: A package for constructing and analysing graphs for landscape genetics in R. Methods Ecol Evol.12: 539–547.
• Tang T., Li J., Sun H. & Deng C. 2021. Priority areas identified through spatial habitat suitability index and network analysis: Wild boar populations as proxies for tigers in and around the Hupingshan and Houhe National Nature Reserves. Science of The Total Environment.774: 145067.
• Tarabon S., Dutoit T. & Isselin-Nondedeu F. 2021. Pooling biodiversity offsets to improve habitat connectivity and species conservation. Journal of Environmental Management.277: 111425.
• Tiang D.C.F., Morris A., Bell M., Gibbins C.N., Azhar B. & Lechner A.M. 2021. Ecological connectivity in fragmented agricultural landscapes and the importance of scattered trees and small patches. Ecol Process.10: 20.
• Youngquist M.B & Boone M.D 2021. Making the connection: combining habitat suitability and landscape connectivity to understand species distribution in an agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecological.36: 2795–2809.
• Zhang R., Zhang L., Zhong Q., Zhang Q., Ji Y., Song P. & Wang Q. 2021. An optimized evaluation method of an urban ecological network: The case of the Minhang District of Shanghai. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.62: 127158.
• Zorrilla‐Azcué S., González‐Rodríguez A., Oyama K., González M.A. & Rodríguez‐Correa H. 2021. The DNA history of a lonely oak: Quercus humboldtii phylogeography in the Colombian Andes. Ecol Evol.ece3.7529.

2020

• Balbi M., Croci S., Petit E.J., Butet A., Georges R., Madec L., Caudal J. & Ernoult A. 2020. Least‐cost path analysis for urban greenways planning: A test with moths and birds across two habitats and two cities. Journal of Applied Ecology.
• Bourdouxhe A., Duflot R., Radoux J. & Dufrêne M. 2020. Comparison of methods to model species habitat networks for decision-making in nature conservation: The case of the wildcat in southern Belgium. Journal for Nature Conservation.58: 125901.
• Bourgeois M. & Sahraoui Y., 2020. Modelling in the Context of an Environmental Mobilisation: A Graph-Based Approach for Assessing the Landscape Ecological Impacts of a Highway Project. Ekológia (Bratislava), 39:1 88–100.
• Clauzel C. & Godet C. 2020. Combining spatial modeling tools and biological data for improved multispecies assessment in restoration areas. Biological Conservation.250: 108713.
• Han Q. & Keeffe G., 2020. Mapping the Permeability of Urban Landscapes as Stepping Stones for Forest Migration. in Roggema R. & Roggema A., Smart and Sustainable Cities and Buildings, 237–248.
• Hirayama H., Tomita M. & Hara K., 2020. Quantitative monitoring of changes in forest habitat connectivity following the great eastern Japan earthquake and tsunami. Landscape Ecology, 1–12.
• Kheirkhah Ghehi N., MalekMohammadi B. & Jafari H. 2020. Integrating habitat risk assessment and connectivity analysis in ranking habitat patches for conservation in protected areas. Journal for Nature Conservation.56: 125867.
• Mu B., Liu C., Tian G., Xu Y., Zhang Y., Mayer A.L., Lv R., He R. & Kim G., 2020. Conceptual Planning of Urban – Rural Green Space from a Multidimensional Perspective : A Case Study of Zhengzhou , China. sustainability, 12:2863 1–20.
• Perez G., Bastian S., Chastagner A., Agoulon A., Rantier Y., Vourc’h G., Plantard O. & Butet A., 2020. Relationships between landscape structure and the prevalence of two tick-borne infectious agents, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, in small mammal communities. Landscape Ecology, 35:2 435–451.
• Préau C., Grandjean F., Sellier Y., Gailledrat M., Bertrand R. & Isselin-Nondedeu F., 2020. Habitat patches for newts in the face of climate change: local scale assessment combining niche modelling and graph theory. Scientific Reports, 10:1 3570.
• Tarabon S., Calvet C., Delbar V., Dutoit T. & Isselin-Nondedeu F. 2020. Integrating a landscape connectivity approach into mitigation hierarchy planning by anticipating urban dynamics. Landscape and Urban Planning.202: 103871.

2019

• Balbi M., Petit E.J., Croci S., Nabucet J., Georges R., Madec L., Ernoult A., 2019. Ecological relevance of least cost path analysis: An easy implementation method for landscape urban planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 244: 61-68.
• Han Q., Keeffe G., 2019. Mapping the Flow of Forest Migration through the City under Climate Change. Urban Planning, 4:1 139-151.
• Han Q., Keeffe G., 2019. Stepping stones Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
• Hardion L., Pouvreau M., Schwoertzig E., Hoff M., Nguefack J., Combroux I., 2019. Performance, genetic and ecological insights for the conservation of the endangered large pink, Dianthus superbus L. (Caryophyllaceae) in semi-natural grassland. Botany Letters, 166:1 104-112.
• Hu T., Huang X., Li X., Liang L., Xue F., 2019. Toward a Better Understanding of Urban Sprawl: Linking Spatial Metrics and Landscape Networks Dynamics, in: Geertman S., Zhan Q., Allan A., Pettit C., Computational Urban Planning and Management for Smart Cities. CUPUM 2019. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, Springer, Cham. 163-178
• Kim K., Serret H., Clauzel C., Andersen D, Jang Y., 2019. Spatio-temporal characteristics and predictions of the endangered leopard cat Prionailirus bengalensis euptilura road-kills in the Republic of Korea Global Ecology and Conservation, 19: e00673.
• Meza-Joya F.L., Ramos E., & Cardona D., 2019. Spatio-temporal patterns of mammal road mortality in middle magdalena valley, Colombia. Oecologia Australis, 23:3 575–588.
• Tarabon S., Bergès L., Dutoit T., Isselin-Nondedeu F., 2019. Maximizing habitat connectivity in the mitigation hierarchy. A case study on three terrestrial mammals in an urban environment Journal of Environmental Management, 243: 340-349.
• Tarabon S., Bergès L., Dutoit T., Isselin-Nondedeu F., 2019. Environmental impact assessment of development projects improved by merging species distribution and habitat connectivity modelling Journal of Environmental Management, 241: 439-449.
• Upadhyay S., Mondal T., Pathak P.A., Roy A., Agrawal G. & Bhattacharya S., 2019. A network theoretic study of potential invasion and spread of Lantana camara in a part of Rajaji Tiger Reserve, India. Ecological Complexity, 40: 100793.
• Uroy L., Mony C., Ernoult A., 2019. Additive effects of connectivity provided by different habitat types drive plant assembly Scientific Reports, 9: 13952.
• Clauzel C. & Bonnevalle C., 2019. Apports de la modélisation spatiale pour la gestion de la trame verte et bleue. Cybergeo.

2018

• Balbi M., Ernoult A., Poli P., Madec L., Guiller A., Martin M.C., Nabucet J., Beaujouan V., Petit E., 2018. Functional connectivity in replicated urban landscapes in the land snail (Cornu aspersum). Molecular Ecology, 27: 1357-1370.
• Clauzel C., Jeliazkov A., Mimet A., 2018. Coupling a landscape-based approach and graph theory to maximize multispecific connectivity in bird communities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 179: 1-16.
• Duflot R., Avon C., Roche P., Bergès L., 2018. Combining habitat suitability models and spatial graphs for more effective landscape conservation planning: An applied methodological framework and a species case study. Journal for Nature Conservation, 46: 38-47.
• Foltête J.C., 2018. A parcel-based graph to match connectivity analysis with field action in agricultural landscapes: Is node removal a reliable method? Landscape and Urban Planning, 178: 32-42.
• Li J., Li D., Xue Y., Wu B., He X., Liu F., 2018. Identifying potential refugia and corridors under climate change: A case study of endangered Sichuan golden monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in Qinling Mountains, China. American Journal of Primatology, 80:e22929: 1-11.
• Mechai S., Margos G., Feil E. J., Lindsay L. R., Michel P., Kotchi S. O., Ogden N. H., 2018. Evidence for an effect of landscape connectivity on Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto dispersion in a zone of range expansion Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, 9:6 1407-1415.
• Mony C., Abadie J., Gill-Tena A., Burel F., Ernoult A., 2018. Effects of connectivity on animal-dispersed forest plant communities in agriculture-dominated landscapes. Journal of Vegetation Science, 29: 167-178.
• Polenšek M., Pirnat J., 2018. Forest Patch Connectivity: The Case of the Kranj–Sora Basin, Slovenia. Acta geographica Slovenica, 58:1 83–95.
• Bourgeois M., Cossard E., Fressard M., 2018. Mesurer et spatialiser la connectivité pour modéliser les changements des systèmes environnementaux. Approches comparées en écologie du paysage et en géomorphologie. Géomorphologie, 23: 289-308.
• Girardet, X., Clauzel C., 2018. Graphab : 14 réalisations à découvrir. [En ligne].

2017

• Betbeder J., Laslier M., Hubert-Moy L., Burel F., Baudry J., 2017. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images improve habitat suitability models. Landscape Ecology, doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0546-3.
• Clauzel C., 2017. Evaluating and mitigating the impact of a high-speed railway on connectivity: a case study with an amphibian species in France, in Borda-de-Agua L., Barrientos R., Beja P. Pereira H., Railway Ecology, Springer, 215-228.
• Correa Ayram C.A., Mendoza M.E., Etter A., Pérez Salicrup D.R., 2017. Potential distribution of mountain cloud forest in Michoacán, Mexico: prioritization for conservation in the context of landscape connectivity. Environmental Management, doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0871-y.
• Foltête J.C., Vuidel G., 2017. Using landscape graphs to delineate ecologically functional areas. Landscape Ecology, 32: 249-263.
• Kohler, M., Tannier C., Blond N., Aguejdad R., Clappier A., 2017. Impacts of several urban-sprawl countermeasures on building (space heating) energy demands and urban heat island intensities. A case study. Urban Climate, 19: 92-121.
• Lechner, A.M., Sprod D., Carter O., Lefroy E.C., 2017. Characterising landscape connectivity for conservation planning using a dispersal guild approach. Landscape Ecology, 32: 99-113.
• Rochat E., Manel S., Deschamps-Cottin M., Widmer I., Joost S., 2017. Persistence of butterfly populations in fragmented habitats along urban density gradients: motility helps. Heredity, 119:5 328–338.
• Sahraoui Y., Foltête J.-C., Clauzel C., 2017. A multi-species approach for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on landscape connectivity. Landscape Ecology, 32: 1819–1835.
• Wenwen, L., Clauzel C., Dai Y., Wu G., Giraudoux P., Li L., 2017. Improving landscape connectivity for the Yunnan snub-nosed monkey through cropland reforestation using graph theory. Journal for Nature Conservation, 38: 46-55.

2016

• Bertin, A., Gouin N., Baumel A., Gianoli E., Serratosa J., Osorio R., Manel S., 2016. Genetic variation of loci potentially under selection confounds species–genetic diversity correlations in a fragmented habitat. Molecular Ecology, 10.1111/mec.13923
• Fagan, M.E., DeFries R.S., Sesnie S.E., Arroyo J.P., Chazdon R.L., 2016. Targeted reforestation could reverse declines in connectivity for understory birds in a tropical habitat corridor. Ecological Applications, 26: 1456–1474.
• Foltête J.C., Couval G., Fontanier M., Vuidel G., Giraudoux P., 2016. A graph-based approach to defend agro-ecological systems against water vole outbreaks. Ecological Indicators, 71: 87–98.
• Kang W., Minor E.S., Lee D., Park C.R., 2016. Predicting impacts of climate change on habitat connectivity of Kalopanax septemlobus in South Korea. Acta Oecologica, 71: 31–38.
• Kang W., Minor E.S., Woo D., Lee D., Park C.R., 2016. Forest mammal roadkills as related to habitat connectivity in protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation.
• Mimet, A., Clauzel, C., Foltête, J.C., 2016. Locating wildlife crossings for multispecies connectivity across linear infrastructures. Landscape Ecology, 31: 1955-1973.
• Tannier C., Bourgeois M., Houot H., Foltête J.C., 2016. Impact of urban developments on the functional connectivity of forested habitats: a joint contribution of advanced urban models and landscape graphs. Land Use Policy, 52: 76-91.
• Girardet, X., Foltête J.C., Clauzel C., Vuidel G., 2016. Restauration de la connectivité écologique : proposition méthodologique pour une localisation optimisée des passages à faune. Vertigo, [En ligne], Hors-série 24.

2015

• Clauzel C., Bannwarth C., Foltête J.C., 2015. Integrating regional-scale connectivity in habitat restoration: An application for amphibian conservation in eastern France. Journal for Nature Conservation, 23: 98-107.
• Clauzel C., Xiqing D., Gongsheng W., Giraudoux P., Li L., 2015. Assessing the impact of road developments on connectivity across multiple scales: Application to Yunnan snub-nosed monkey conservation. Biological Conservation, 192: 207-217.
• Girardet X., Conruyt-Rogeon G., Foltête J.C., 2015. Does regional landscape connectivity influence the location of roe deer roadkill hotspots? European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61: 731-742.
• Lechner A.M., Doerr V., Harris R., Doerr E., Lefroy E., 2015. A framework for incorporating fine-scale dispersal behaviour into biodiversity conservation planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 141: 11-23.
• Lechner A.M., Brown G., Raymond C.M., 2015. Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning. Landscape Ecology, 30: 699-713.
• Villemey A., Van Halder I., Ouin A., Barbaro L., Chenot J., Tessier P., Calatayud F., Martin H., Roche P., Archaux F., 2015. Mosaic of grasslands and woodlands is more effective than habitat connectivity to conserve butterflies in French farmland. Biological Conservation, 191: 206-215.

2014

• Foltête J.C., Girardet X., Clauzel C., 2014. A methodological framework for the use of landscape graphs in land-use planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124: 140-150.
• Gil-Tena A., Nabucet J., Mony C., Abadie J., Saura S., Butet A., Burel F., Ernoult A., 2014. Woodland bird response to landscape connectivity in an agriculture-dominated landscape: a functional community approach. Community Ecology, 15: 256-268.
• Kupfer J.A., Meitzen K.M., Gao P., 2014. Flooding and surface connectivity of taxodium-nyssa stands in a southern floodplain forest ecosystem. River Research and Applications, 31:1299–1310.
• Lechner A., Lefroy E.C., 2014. General approach to planning connectivity from local scales to regional (GAP CLoSR): combining multi-criteria analysis and connectivity science to enhance conservation outcomes at the regional scale in the Lower Hunter. University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania.
• Serret H., Raymond R., Foltête J.C., Clergeau P., Simon L., Machon N., 2014. Potential contributions of green spaces at business sites to the ecological network in an urban agglomeration: The case of the Ile-de-France region, France. Landscape and Urban Planning, 131: 27-35.

2013

• Clauzel C., Girardet X., Foltête J.C., 2013. Impact assessment of a high-speed railway line on species distribution: Application to the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) in Franche-Comté. Journal of Environmental Management, 127: 125-134.
• Girardet X., Foltête J.C., Clauzel C., 2013. Designing a graph-based approach in landscape ecological assessment of linear infrastructures. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 42: 10-17.
• Tournant P., Afonso E., Roué S., Giraudoux P., Foltête J.C., 2013. Evaluating the effect of habitat connectivity on the distribution of lesser horseshoe bat maternity roosts using landscape graphs. Biological Conservation, 164: 39-49.
• Foltête J.C., Girardet X., Clauzel C., Tournant P., Vuidel G., Bannwarth C., Roué S., Afonso E., Giraudoux P., 2013. Estimer l’impact des grandes infrastructures de transport sur la distribution des espèces : proposition et test d’un protocole méthodologique, in Luginbühl Y. (dir.), Infrastructures de transport terrestres, écosystèmes et paysages, des liaisons dangereuses ? La documentation française, Paris, 201-218.

2012

• Foltête J.C., Clauzel C., Vuidel G., Tournant P., 2012. Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models. Landscape Ecology, 27: 1-13.
• Foltête J.C., Clauzel C., Vuidel G., 2012. A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks. Environmental Modelling & Software, 38: 316-327.
• Foltête J.C., Giraudoux P., 2012. A graph-based approach to investigating the influence of the landscape on population spread processes. Ecological Indicators, 18: 684-692.
• Tannier C., Foltête J.C., Girardet X., 2012. Assessing the capacity of different urban forms to preserve the connectivity of ecological habitats. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105: 128-139.
• Foltête J.C., Clauzel C., Girardet X., Tournant P., Vuidel G., 2012. La modélisation des réseaux écologiques par les graphes paysagers. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 22(4), 641-658.